Image for P2C2 Group's Header for Newsletter

FEDERAL SECTOR REPORT

February 2002
(c) P2C2 Group, Inc.

SUBSCRIBE

IN THIS ISSUE

Bush Frames the Budget for FY 2003
Federal Discretionary Spending
Who Will Have the New Discretionary Dollars?
Spending for Homeland Security
Growth of Federal IT Spending
Link of the Month

BUSH FRAMES THE BUDGET FOR FY 2003

With defense and homeland security as overarching themes, President George W. Bush proposed the most sweeping redirection of federal budget priorities in nearly 20 years. Like the Reagan Administration, the Bush budget makes the Department of Defense a big winner, and domestic spending is filtered through a conservative agenda. But times have changed, and the proposed federal outlays acknowledge information technology (IT) as a driving force. George W. has replaced old-line rhetoric with the language of corporate management: performance and results.

The new budget priorities are not yet a "done deal," because Congress will have its say. Some will decry deficit spending and the retreat from the ideal of a balanced budget, while others will attempt to resuscitate programs that the administration would put on the chopping block. But, have no doubts, the Bush Administration has successfully redefined the playing field for the battle over budget priorities. The priorities of defense, security, and IT will prevail.

The greatest risk to contractors and grantees in the Federal Sector, however, is the potential for a stalemate in the budget battles--where the White House and Congress cannot arrive at a compromise. Agencies can't concentrate on procurement awards when there is too much uncertainty over federal money, and that's bad for business.

Overall, the proposed budget merits detailed analysis. Examples of highlights are:

  • IRS would gain about half a billion dollars, with much of the money going to updated computer and phone systems.
  • Health care for veterans would receive a $1.5 billion boost at VA.
  • NOAA would gain $93 million to improve storm forecasting.
  • DoD would expand intelligence gathering, analysis, and consolidation capabilities.
  • An added $433 million would go to the National Nuclear Security Administration (Department of Energy).
  • The FBI would gain $412 million for IT, intelligence gathering, and background investigations.

For my clients in educational organizations, I will digress a moment: Education will walk a tightrope between modest budget increases and ambitious goals for reform. The proposed $50.3 billion Department of Education budget includes increases in discretionary spending:

  • $1 billion more for Title I, which is released to State and Local Education Agencies using a formula based on the number of disadvantaged students;
  • $1 billion more for special education;
  • A $100 million boost in early literacy programs;
  • Funds for school-choice demonstration programs.

FEDERAL DISCRETIONARY SPENDING

Vast amounts of the federal budget are locked in mandatory spending. The $489 billion budget request for HHS, for example, includes about $429 billion for mandatory programs like Medicare and Medicaid, leaving some $60 billion for discretionary spending.

The Bush budget would increase discretionary spending by about 8.4% in FY 2003. Of the $746 billion total, well over half of the discretionary spending will be committed to defense and homeland security. There is virtually no overall growth in other government discretionary spending:

Discretionary Budget Totals, U.S. Budget by Fiscal Year

Dollars in Billions (Source: OMB, February 2002)

 

2001

2002

2003

Discretionary Budget Authority

 

 

 

Homeland Security

10

12

25

Department of Defense

303

328

366

Other Operations of Government

330

348

355

TOTAL DISCRETIONARY

643

688

746

WHO WILL HAVE THE NEW DISCRETIONARY DOLLARS?

If the Bush Budget is approved, these are the agencies that will have the extra dollars:

 The Top Ten Agencies for Discretionary Budgets

FY 2003 - Dollars in Billions (Adapted from OMB, February 2002)

Agency

2001 Actual

 

2002 Estimate

 

2003 Estimate

 

Change: 2002-2003

Defense-Military

305.6

 

330.8

 

369.3

 

38.4

Health and Human Services

54.5

 

59.8

 

65.3

 

5.5

Federal Emergency Management Agency

2.4

 

3.1

 

6.6

 

3.5

Transportation

18.0

 

16.6

 

19.8

 

3.2

Housing and Urban Development

28.4

 

29.5

 

31.5

 

2.0

Veterans Affairs

23.2

 

24.7

 

26.4

 

1.8

Energy

20.2

 

21.0

 

21.9

 

1.0

Treasury

15.1

 

15.8

 

16.6

 

0.8

Education

40.1

 

49.8

1

50.3

 

0.5

State

7.8

 

8.9

 

9.2

 

0.4

1 Includes a $1.3 billion supplemental proposal for Pell Grants. The baseline was $48.5 billion.

SPENDING FOR HOMELAND SECURITY

The Bush Budget would almost double the spending for homeland defense--an amalgam of outlays for public safety (police and fire fighting), border patrols and security, aviation security, bio-terrorism counter-measures, and other initiatives. The Departments of Defense, Transportation, and Justice will receive approximately three-fifths (61%) of the money. HHS will take the lead on bio-terrorism. As a small agency, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will see the most dramatic increase in discretionary spending in FY 2003. A functional table of spending priorities, condensed from OMB information, is below.

Spending Priorities for Homeland Security

Dollars in Billions (Source: OMB, February 2002)

 

2001

2002

2003

Total, Homeland Security

16.0

19.5

37.7

    Supporting first responders

0.3

0.3

3.5

    Defending against biological terrorism

1.4

1.4

5.9

    Securing our borders

7.6

8.8

10.6

    Sharing information and using information technology to secure the homeland

0.1

0.2

0.7

    Aviation security

0.4

1.5

4.8

    Other homeland security

6.3

7.4

12.2

GROWTH OF FEDERAL IT SPENDING

President Bush's budget proposal would more than double the growth of federal technology spending, providing major opportunities for government contractors. Total federal spending for IT in FY 2003 would top $52 billion, compared to $48 billion in FY 2002.

Contractors however should not expect "fat city." Federal IT managers are under considerable pressure to improve results, accountability, cost efficiency, and better service to the public.

Contractors would do well to demonstrate how their products and services fit into the President's agenda for management reform. This is more than a matter of claiming to save $10 per product or $1 per labor hour. Your solution should make strategic sense, fit into the big-picture capital investment plan, and support the enterprise-wide management of IT. Other tips:

  • Small IT companies should strengthen their strategic alliances with the big contractors who are likely to benefit the most from budget increases.
  • Niche players need to figure out how to become bundled into broad solutions for cyber-security, e-Government, and infrastructure improvements.

An agency-by-agency budget for Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, and 2003 follows:

Report on Information Technology (IT) Spending for the Federal Government

Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, and 2003 - Dollars in Millions (Source: OMB; February 2002)

Agency

Final Total FY01

Final Total FY02

Final Total FY03

Department of the Army

$5,150.9

$4,814.1

$5,147.9

Department of the Air Force

$5,835.4

$5,640.4

$6,345.0

Corps of Engineers

$238.0

$247.0

$240.0

Defense Agencies

$7,661.3

$8,353.9

$9,226.5

Department of Commerce

$918.2

$947.0

$1,051.0

Department of Energy

$1,088.0

$1,159.0

$1,142.0

Department of Interior

$582.0

$627.6

$671.6

Department of Justice

$1,872.8

$2,093.3

$2,050.6

Department of Labor

$365.0

$393.0

$497.1

Department of State

$713.2

$896.7

$891.0

Department of Transportation

$2,448.1

$2,513.8

$2,660.9

Department of Education

$581.1

$574.7

$580.3

Environmental Protection Agency

$338.9

$360.9

$374.9

Department of Health and Human Services

$3,920.6

$4,237.0

$4,481.4

Department of Housing and Urban Development

$328.7

$376.1

$354.1

Federal Communications Commission

$51.7

$48.1

$56.9

Federal Emergency Management Agency

$140.1

$165.5

$175.6

General Services Administration

$387.0

$455.0

$460.0

National Archives and Record Administration

$42.6

$57.4

$62.2

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

$2,327.0

$2,558.0

$2,511.0

Department of the Navy

$4,110.0

$4,588.0

$5,311.7

National Gallery of Art

$2.4

$2.8

$4.0

National Labor Relations Board

$11.0

$13.5

$14.8

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

$59.5

$64.0

$68.5

National Science Foundation

$29.3

$29.9

$40.7

Office of Personnel Management

$82.0

$92.0

$120.0

Patent and Trademark Office

$240.3

$231.2

$318.1

Social Security Administration

$691.0

$742.0

$737.0

Small Business Administration

$46.0

$39.0

$56.0

Smithsonian Institution

$39.7

$48.2

$66.0

Department of Treasury

$2,876.0

$3,098.2

$3,241.2

US Agency for International Development

$89.6

$76.1

$83.0

US Department of Agriculture

$1,318.5

$1,491.5

$1,692.0

Department of Veterans Affairs

$1,155.5

$1,181.2

$1,357.3

Total IT Investments for the Federal Government

$45,741.6

$48,216.1

$52,090.3


LINK OF THE MONTH

We will propose our own web site as link of the month. A detailed spreadsheet of the federal IT budget is at our web site. Go to http://www.fedprojects.com/s-news.html. The spreadsheet is OMB's roll-up of Agency Form 53s, which identify specific projects to be funded by the proposed budget. 

Back issues of this newsletter are at http://www.fedprojects.com. Many of our subscribers have discovered us through search engines that point to one or more of the newsletters we have posted to the P2C2 Group's Proposals & Projects Web Site. The first issue was published in the summer of 1996, and we offer many, many tips, thought-starters, and how-to articles.

CONSULTING SERVICES

We provide enterprise-level management consulting services for federal agencies and the contractors who support them. Our areas of specialization are Capital Planning and Investment Control, Enterprise Architecture, strategic planning, performance evaluation, and acquisition support including work statements. Our consulting specialty includes experience in many related areas such as CIO program support, earned value management, risk management, the C&A process for security, and customer satisfaction surveys.


Best wishes,

Jim Kendrick
4101 Denfeld Avenue
Kensington, MD 20895
301-942-7985

NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE


The P2C2 Group, Inc.
4101 Denfeld Avenue | Kensington, MD 20895
Point of Contact: Jim Kendrick, President
e-mail: kendrick@p2c2group.com
phone: 301-942-7985 | fax: 301-942-7986

Home | Services | Articles | Resources | Results| Contact