|
|
FEDERAL
SECTOR REPORT
February
2004
Jim
Kendrick, Certified Management Consultant
A
Newsletter for Federal Agencies, Contractors, and Grantees
To
subscribe or opt out, please see end of message.
IN
THIS ISSUE
Steps for
Developing OMB Exhibit 300s for New IT Projects
Link of the
Month: An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture
Consulting
Services
Home Page
(c)
2004 by the P2C2 Group, Inc.
STEPS FOR
DEVELOPING OMB EXHIBIT 300s FOR NEW IT PROJECTS
This is the
second of a series of three articles about how to improve your agency's
performance in management of the Exhibit 300 Business Case process for
major information technology (IT) initiatives. The first article focused on
the obvious but frequently ignored fact that your Business Case must be
prepared thoroughly with an intense focus on scoring well, based on
OMB's criteria. The third article will present suggestions about how to
streamline the enterprise management process for business cases so you
don't get buried in paperwork.
NEW FEDERAL
IT INITIATIVES REQUIRE DETAILED JUSTIFICATION
New
initiatives for federal investments in IT face a rigorous process of
planning and justification to obtain approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). This article outlines basic steps for
developing a major new IT initiative, and it is based on our experience
in preparing over 15 Exhibit 300 Business Cases that agencies have
submitted to OMB.
Our
focus this month is on how to develop new initiatives that are
currently at the conceptual stage or "ground zero." The needs of new
projects are different from legacy systems or recent projects that are
already in system development or implementation phases.
#1. Start
with the Agency's Most Urgent Performance Goals.
Your IT project needs to solve a BIG agency problem or achieve dramatic
program results. There are many worthwhile initiatives, and they may
support a wide range of performance goals. The following are
hypothetical examples, and a new initiative might address one or more
of these ... or other goals of similar significance:
- Cut the time in half for
processing citizen applications for public services and benefits
- Reduce paperwork burden on the
public by 3 million hours annually
- Improve government effectiveness
in monitoring and responding to threats (communicable diseases,
weather-induced disasters, safety, defense, power grid disruptions,
international economic crises, etc.)
- Use teleconferencing to
eliminate $5 million of yearly travel costs
- Reduce error rates for
billion-dollar federal grants-in-aid programs administered by State
governments
- Reduce the number of personnel
needed for "back office" financial and human resource functions through
e-solutions and workflow simplification
- Consolidate 100 toll-free
hotlines into a single outsourced National Call Center
that improves information quality and reduces costs
- Consolidate 12 agency-level
networks and e-mail systems into one Department-wide system
#2. Define Your Strategy for Business Case Development. Typically,
the business case for a new project will require between three and
eight months of preparation. Your strategy for developing the Exhibit
300 and supporting business case documents should address all of the
steps suggested in this article and respond to the
requirements of Circular A-11, Section 300.
The sidebar in the right column provides a
road map for topics that should be addressed in your strategy.
#3. Identify
and Involve Stakeholders. A major new initiative
generally requires broad support and a change management strategy. Not
everyone will be happy about proposed changes, because the status quo
is either comfortable
or endurable. Some general suggestions are to:
- Involve line managers whenever
appropriate--agency heads and program managers--because an IT solution
must support improvements to the overall business results of the agency
- Identify other stakeholders and
determine a way to keep them informed and/or involved
- Keep briefings well structured
(PowerPoint briefings, brief issues papers)
- Establish credibility by
conducting professional-quality background research and planning
#4. Document Your Baseline. You will need to
document your current business requirements, workflow, problems, risks,
costs, and performance metrics. Such a baseline will be used to
estimate how much of an improvement your proposed initiative is likely
to achieve. Note: the baseline should usually not be considered as one
of the alternatives proposed in the business case.
#5. Identify
Project Results and Requirements. The purpose of
this step is to define what the new project will accomplish for the
agency (see Step #1) and Stakeholders (see Step #3). A high-level
Requirements document should specify general business and IT
capabilities necessary to meet agency and Stakeholder needs. However,
the specifications should not be so narrow that they rule out
potentially attractive alternatives.
#6. Explore
Outside-the-Box Solutions. The best option
for a new investment may be to redefine your project or to outsource
the solution to another agency or to a commercial source. By no means
should you simply think only about "updating" your legacy solution to a
new version of the same solution. Our recent article about Alternatives Analysis
provides suggestions about how to improve the effectiveness of your
search for the best options.
#7. Start Early on Security & Privacy
Issues. The business case for a new
project must address many security and privacy issues. Moreover, in the
Exhibit
300, you want to be able to state specific
dates for your:
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Project Risk Management Plan
- System Security Plan
You will also need to assess information
security requirements in sufficient detail
to estimate costs for security--in terms
of technical and other controls, the Certification
& Accreditation process, and ongoing
security management. The Exhibit 300 asks
you to state who is paying for information
security--and how much money for security
is included in the Budget Year pricing.
#8. Consider OMB's Scoring System. When
you prepare an OMB Exhibit 300 for a new IT capital investment, you
must fully address ten criteria, and OMB will score your project on
each of these. Our article about how to Improve Scores on
Your OMB Exhibit 300s will serve as a
good introduction. Follow this up by reading the basic guidance in OMB
Circular A-11, Section
300.
|
Road Map for a
New
Exhibit 300
Your
strategy for developing a new OMB Exhibit 300
must identify how you will:
- Identify
your internal review processes: Investment Review Board, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer, Procurement Executive,
Agency Head(s)
- Define
the purpose and objectives of the project
- Align
the project with E-government and the President's Management Agenda
- Seek
cross-organizational cooperation: inter-departmental, state/local,
public/private
- Identify
performance goals and metrics
- Select
and involve your Integrated Project Team
- Review
market research and best practices to explore potential alternatives
- Define
alternatives
- Identify
costs for each alternative
- Enumerate,
quantify, and develop cost estimates for benefits
- Prepare
a risk assessment for major alternatives and estimate risk costs
- Conduct
a cost benefits analysis
- Recommend
a solution
- Define
the Enterprise Architecture including e-Government and the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act Plan
- Start
early on your information security assessments, plans, and Privacy
Impact Assessment
- Develop
a high-level Acquisition Plan
- Develop
a Detailed Project Management Plan with schedule, milestones, and costs
- Prepare
detailed documentation: Requirements/Scope, Risk Management and
Mitigation, Business Case including Alternatives, Costs, and Benefits;
and Information Security
- Review,
Score, Refine and Finalize
|
#9. Use the
New Project to Advance Your Enterprise Architecture
(EA). Integrating IT capital planning
with enterprise architecture and program performance management will be
central to your long-term success. In addition, each
new major investment should strengthen your
EA and its alignment with the Federal Enterprise Architecture.
Enterprise
Architecture is a complex concept that extends far beyond technology.
It also encompasses business, information, and solution architectures.
Some key EA questions to ask when planning a major IT investment:
- How should your agency's
business (mission) function drive the other EA layers (information,
technology, solutions)?
- How can IT improve the
measurable performance results of agency mission and programs?
- Can you align the project with a
federal-wide EA strategy (that supports a common solution on a
cross-organizational or inter-Departmental basis)?
- How does the project fit into
the architecture and strategy of e-Government?
- How can the project contribute
to a modernized and less costly technology layer?
- How can the project improve
data-sharing between business processes?
- Can the project support
integration of multiple business functions and processes to simplify
workflow and reduce the cycle time?
- How will the project link to the
EA framework for performance metrics and results?
General information about the Federal Enterprise Architecture is
available at http://www.feapmo.gov.
We also intend to address EA in a future article.
#10. Consider Risks. Some of the newest Exhibit 300s
include risk-adjusted costs, and a new project should give full
consideration to risks, cost of risk, and realistic means for
mitigating risks. A
general introduction to the topic is available in our previous article
on Risk
Management.
#11. Develop Early Prototypes of Solutions
and Documentation. One of our favorite strategies
is to develop "trial balloon" documents early in the planning process.
This may include:
- Early PowerPoint briefings about
objectives and requirements--as a means of beginning to define the
scope of the project
- An early questionnaire to
stakeholders to determine basic facts about their needs and how they
might use the system
- A high-level Requirements
document to see if stakeholders are generally in agreement about what
the project needs to accomplish
- A "straw man" Exhibit 300 to
test where we must strengthen the business case to score well at OMB
All of the early prototypes are potentially "throw away" documents.
Indeed, that is part of the drill: In critical reviews of the
early work, you may find much more realistic solutions. In one recent
project, we even developed a new alternative that wasn't apparent when
developing the Straw Man 300.
#12. Develop
a Quantitative Model. One of our most useful tools is
a spreadsheet model that occupies approximately 18 tabs in Excel. The
entire model is integrated to encompass:
- Cost analysis of the current
(baseline) business processes
- Risk assessment that yields
risk-adjusted costs
- Detailed pricing and analysis
for each alternative over the multi-year lifecycle
- Comparative analysis by
alternative, phase, and fiscal year
- Break-out of costs for each
alternative for Section 1.E of Exhibit 300
- Estimate for full-time
equivalents (FTEs) with financial loads
- Financial benefits
- Cost benefits analysis
- Return on investment
- Exhibit 300's 1.H.2 Cost and
Schedule break-out by fiscal year
- A detailed budget in the format
required by the Exhibit 300 (Planning, Acquisition, .Maintenance, FTEs)
by fiscal year
The advantage of having all of the above as an integrated model is that
it is possible to change assumptions about costs, benefits, FTEs, and
risks ... and to recalculate the financial impact quickly and
comprehensively.
#13. Investigate Your Alternatives in Detail. Ideally
this encompasses fact-finding for all alternatives. It will include
discussions with other agencies
that have implemented similar solutions: lessons learned, best
practices, and assessment of vendors/contractors. It should also extend
to market research--possibly even including a published Request for
Information.
#14. Fully Develop Your Alternatives. We
recommend that you fully develop your final three alternatives, because
occasionally you will discover that you will implement an unexpected
alternative. Technology can change. Your EA may be evolving. Security
issues may emerge. For whatever reason, it is very useful to have
viable alternatives to implement if your first choice doesn't work out.
#15. Recommend and Gain Approval for a Solution.
After you develop and evaluate your alternatives, you will recommend an
alternative which may
(or may not) be the lowest cost option. Generally,
you will need to gain the support of your stakeholders, Integrated
Project Team, budget officer, agency head, CIO, and other decision
makers.
#16. Finalize Your Documentation and Business
Case. The next
step is to fully prepare your detailed documentation for the business
case. Generally the Exhibit
300 will be 20 - 60 pages in length (or fewer
pages in the small font for OMB's XML format).
However, the supporting documentation for
the overall business case will often be
300 to 800 pages for a large IT investment.
We are writing few words here, but the step
takes considerable blood, sweat, tears, and time.
#17. Polish, Polish, Polish. Once you
have a draft, you will need to polish it.
Get people who know how OMB scores to review
the document. You want them to find all of
the weaknesses so you can strengthen your
Exhibit 300 before it goes to OMB.
#18. Oh yes: After
your Exhibit 300 goes to OMB, you will probably
need to work on your business case during
the "pass back" season, usually in December.
OMB will typically score and provide brief
comments about your project, and you will
need to make final improvements for re-submission in January.
|
|
LINK OF THE
MONTH: ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
We believe that some of the private-sector
explanations of enterprise strategy provide
a better introduction to EA than federal
documents, which are overloaded with Washington
catch phrases and regulatory language. One brief and lucid explanation
was provided by Dr. Yogesh Malhotra in a paper published in 1996. It's
available at:
http://www.brint.com/papers/enterarch.htm
One
of the interesting aspects of Dr. Malhotra's work is that he links EA
closely to Knowledge Management, which is becoming a crucial resource
for organizational effectiveness.
CONSULTING SERVICES
This is a great time to explore quality options for consulting
services. E-mail or call to schedule a discussion with the P2C2 Group.
Tell us more about your needs, and we can recommend
a solution ... complete with a project plan,
a team, and a cost estimate.
CPIC BRIEFING
We have prepared a briefing for federal agencies about the CPIC process
and our services. Interested? Call us
to schedule an appointment for our one-hour mini-workshop.
HOME PAGE
I have been completing an annual review
of my 401(k) retirement plan, and I've been
struck by how much the investment issues
parallel those for IT capital planning. First
of all there is the matter of risk, and the
economists making forecasts all identify a
variety of variables that will impact investment
results. For example, currency fluctuations
make the U.S.
equities and bond markets less or more attractive to investors from
other countries, and that ultimately will have an effect on Wall Street
prices.
Probably one of the biggest problems for
retail investors is the tendency to chase
past performance. However, just because
an investment has been flying high for the
past three years doesn't guarantee that it will do so next year. That
makes me think we should be judicious when chasing "best practices" in
IT: some impressive solutions of recent years may not always make sense
in the future.
While walking the dogs in (brrrr) 10-degree
weather this morning, I did some reflecting
on economic analysis and the world of federal
IT. If we are well-informed and persistent
investors, maybe we can all contribute to
a long-term productivity growth in the public
sector ... one that systematically grows
the public's return on investment. Those
thoughts and a cup of hot Jasmine tea warmed
my spirits.
Best
wishes,
Jim Kendrick
Certified Management
Consultant
P2C2
Group, Inc.
4101
Denfeld Avenue
Kensington, MD 20895
kendrick@p2c2group.com
301-942-7985
|
Jim Kendrick
with walking associates: Flash and Cinnamon
|
|
|
|
The P2C2 Group, Inc.
4101 Denfeld Avenue | Kensington, MD 20895
Point of Contact: Jim Kendrick, President
e-mail: kendrick@p2c2group.com
phone: 301-942-7985 | fax: 301-942-7986
|
|
|
|