FEDERAL
SECTOR REPORT
January 2003
(c) P2C2 Group,
Inc.
IN THIS ISSUE
E-Government
Act of 2002
Link of the Month
Business Talk
Home Page
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE FEDERAL
SECTOR
A quiet revolution has been
underway in Federal Information Technology (IT) management, beginning
with the Clinger-Cohen Act and the amendments to the Paperwork
Reduction Act. But the broadest and most comprehensive vision is
expressed by the E-Government Act of 2002, which President Bush signed
into law in December 2002. While the focus is on E-Gov, it will have a
major impact on how government manages virtually all networks and
computer applications. This issue of our newsletter introduces you to
highlights of the new law, and we emphasize "highlights," because a
book-length
discourse would be needed to discuss all of the implications. It will
broadly affect general management, public policy, and business
processes--in
addition to IT operations and management. For agencies, contractors,
and
grantees, the federal environment has changed materially.
E-GOVERNMENT ACT OF 2002
The E-Government Act of 2002 is
a wake-up call. Yes, we really are in
the 21st Century, and both the Administration and Congress expect the
federal government to join the party. It will bring the greatest
transformation of government since the era of Franklin Roosevelt, when
the powerful forces of the Great Depression and World War II reshaped
the federal executive branch profoundly.
The federal government has been
evolving toward E-Government for a number of years, with milestones
like the Government Paperwork Elimination Act of 1998. However, the
current Administration jumped in with both
feet, and the Whitehouse established an overall framework for a vision
of the future through the President's Management Agenda (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2002/mgmt.pdf)
and its E-Government Strategy
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/egovstrategy.pdf).
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has led the charge toward
E-Government under Associate Director Mark Forman. OMB budget
priorities reflect a clear focus on E-Government and underlying
requirements such as Return on Investment (ROI), information security,
and alignment of spending with the President's Management Agenda.
The E-Government Act codifies
much of the strategy that the Administration is already implementing.
Perhaps the most important point is that Congress has institutionalized
the strategy, which will now be a framework for all future
administration. The legislation had bipartisan support, and Senator
Lieberman was a major architect of the law.
No Budget Bonanza
The E-Government revolution is
no budget bonanza for agencies or contractors. The new law provides
modest funding for cross-cutting initiatives. However, most of the
change must be financed out of existing appropriations
levels--particularly for domestic programs not involved in the war on
terrorism. Indeed, the near-term emphasis on a War Budget will squeeze
many government agencies.
But squeezing IT dollars is no new phenomenon. Most Fortune 500
companies already expect to pay for IT investments through
corresponding cost savings. The bottom line is that IT investments are
supposed to save money through business process simplification,
standardization, reorganization, consolidation, and reduced maintenance
costs. This concept, which was embedded in the Clinger-Cohen Act (among
others), will come home to roost within the federal government. The
rhetoric must become reality.
For contractors, this will be a time to gain or lose market share--not
through expanding agency budgets but by becoming more (or less)
relevant to the E-Government revolution. Winners will help agencies
squeeze more results out of existing budgets, and they may even help
agencies save money.
The Law
The E-Government Act has five
titles:
Title I--Office of
Management and Budget Electronic Government Services. The first
title establishes a powerful Office of Electronic Government within
OMB, enacts a modest E-Government fund, formalizes the status
of the Chief Information Officers Council, encourages innovative
governmentwide solutions, authorizes the General Services
Administration (GSA) to advise the OMB Office of Electronic Government,
and requires an annual E-Government Report to Congress.
Title II--Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services. The
second title implements E-Government on a multiagency basis by
identifying the responsibilities of each Executive Branch agency and
requiring GSA to establish an interoperable framework for electronic
signatures. Title II encompasses many requirements, which will be
summarized later in this article.
Title III--Information
Security. The third title defines a framework for ensuring the
effectiveness of federal information security, and
it holds agency heads responsible for assuring the security of their
information systems. The Director of OMB is responsible for "developing
and overseeing the implementation of policies, principles, standards,
and guidelines on information security, including through ensuring
timely
agency adoption ... and compliance ...." In addition, the National
Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST) will play a stronger role in
advising
OMB and developing security standards and guidelines.
Title IV--Authorization of
Appropriations and Effective Dates. The E-Government Act takes
effect 120 days after its December 17th
enactment, and the fourth title also authorizes Congress to make
appropriations for Fiscal Years 2003 through 2007.
Title V -- Confidential
Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency. The Director of
OMB is given the authority to oversee the confidentiality and
disclosure of policies addressed by this title, which seeks to
ensure that information provided by individuals and organizations for
statistical purposes is held in confidence and not used as the basis
for adverse actions. Failure to protect the confidentiality of
applicable
statistical information is considered a felony and subject to
imprisonment
(up to five years) and/or fines (up to $250,000). The title also seeks
to reduce paperwork imposed on the public, improve statistical
accuracy,
and authorizes statistical data sharing between the Census, Bureau of
Economic Analysis, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Why the E-Government
Act is Important
We want our readers to begin
rethinking their assumptions about government, because the future is
different. The old paradigms for government operations, programs, and
technology will gradually become history.
Characteristic of
Government Operations
|
Old Way
|
New Way
|
Public
Services
|
Federal
personnel or contractors process paperwork
or phone requests from the public. Responses may take hours, days,
weeks or months.
|
Online
transactions provide almost instant
automated responses to the public in many cases. Federal personnel set
up the rules and evaluate results, but the transactions and
recordkeeping are automated.
|
Hours
of Service
|
Service
is available during normal government
office hours.
|
Service
is 24/7.
|
Customer
Relationship Management
|
The
public doesn't know who to call about federal
information or services, and citizens are often
caught in a referral maze.
|
One-stop
web portals and call centers enable
agencies to implement consistent customer relationship management
policies--and to serve the public better (and at a lower
cost).
|
Cost
of Delivering Public Services
|
Very
labor intensive.
|
Very
automated.
|
Locations
of Federal Offices Serving the Public
|
Complex
organization of
regional and state offices to be accessible to the public.
|
"Back
office" support at one or a few locations.
Just like Gateway computer, you could conduct much of the government
business from "cow country."
|
Types
of Federal Personnel Required
|
A
few managers and supervisors overseeing large
numbers of mid- and junior-level workers.
|
Fewer
federal employees, but most will need to be
highly qualified (high-GS) managers, knowledge workers, and technical
personnel.
|
Government
Web Sites
|
Thousands
of scattered web sites that must be
located on a hit-or-miss basis by the public. Contents, interfaces, and
visual styles are a hodge-podge. Information is organized by
bureaucracy, not by topic or public served.
|
There
ultimately will be a single portal. Agencies
within Departments will gain a consistent look and feel. Locations of
basic information will be predictable. Information will be organized
for the user, rather than for the bureaucracy.
|
Information
|
Difficult
for the public to find.
|
Easy
for the public to find.
|
Computer
Security
|
Inconsistent
approaches to information security,
with some agencies vulnerable to internal and external threats.
|
Government-wide
standards
for information security with more rigorous requirements for the
protection of government information, computers, and networks.
|
Privacy
|
Most
agencies already try to protect Privacy Act information, but they are
challenged to accommodate the new electronic formats.
|
Procedures
for assuring privacy and confidentiality
will be strengthened, and increased effort will
be directed at protecting electronic information--including that
submitted by citizens to government Web sites.
|
Federal
Productivity
|
Many
government workers have been diverted from
their primary job responsibilities because they must respond to ad
hoc inquiries from the public.
|
E-Government
will do much
of the work in explaining federal programs, regulations, and
procedures. Most workers will be more productive because they can
concentrate on their main duties.
|
Work
Flow
|
Documents
are physically passed along from office
to office.
|
Workflow
software routes electronic documents along
decision-making and approval pathways.
|
Information
Management
|
Finding
and organizing needed information is
difficult.
|
Records
management and content management systems
for electronic information make "knowledge management" feasible.
|
More Dimensions of the Legislation
The legislation has a great
deal of detail--more than we can cover in
depth in this article. Nonetheless, let's survey important provisions
of
Titles II and III:
Title II also mandates
a unified governmentwide portal for Web access by citizens, authorizes
the Chief Justice and other chief judges to establish websites with
consistent core information, and directs
regulatory agencies to make Federal Register information readily
available
at agency websites. The second title requires improvement in how
government
information is organized on websites, directs the OMB Office of
Electronic
Government to establish standards for agency websites, and directs
the National Archives and Records Administration to submit
recommendations
about preserving federal electronic records. There will also be a
single
public domain directory of all public federal websites, and the
Director
of OMB is authorized to define a repository that integrates information
about all research and development funded by the federal government.
In addition, agencies must conduct Privacy Impact Assessments of
sensitive
systems to ensure sufficient protections for the privacy of personal
information. To support this overall vision of electronic Government,
there is a Federal IT Workforce Development initiative to improve the
skills of the federal workforce in using information technology to
deliver
information and services. There is a limited IT exchange program to
swap
experts between the public and private sectors, as well as pilot use of
"share in savings" contracts whereby both agencies and contractors
share
the dollars when they successfully cut government costs. The title also
establishes other provisions such as state/local government purchasing
through the GSA schedules, pilot efforts to improve the
interoperability of federal systems, projects to encourage integrated
collection and management of data, Community Technology Centers,
enhanced crisis management, and common protocols for Geographic
Information Systems.
Additional Provisions of
Title III. Agency heads are responsible for assuring the security
of systems within their respective agencies, periodically testing and
evaluating security controls, and delegating to the Chief Information
Officer the authority to ensure compliance with federal information
security requirements. Each agency must carry out an agencywide
information security program approved by the Director of OMB, and the
security must be assured throughout the entire system life cycle. Each
agency must also provide reports to OMB and Congress , and the status
of agency compliance will be linked to the annual budget, IT resource
management, and a Performance Plan (probably an extension of OMB's
current Plan of Action & Milestones reporting). Each year, the
agency must obtain an independent evaluation of its information
security program and practices to determine effectiveness. The title
authorizes the federal information security incident reporting center.
The Title designates the Secretary of Commerce (who oversees NIST) to
prescribe standards
and guidelines for federal information systems, and, further, "the
Secretary
shall make standards prescribed ... compulsory and binding to the
extent
determined necessary by the Secretary to improve the efficiency of
operation
or security of federal information systems." In addition, there will be
an Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board which advises NIST,
the
Secretary of Commerce, and other leadership.
LINKS OF THE MONTH
We
highly recommend that you review the E-Government Act of 2002 for
yourself. It is also known as Public Law No: 107-347. It was
sent to the President for signature as H.R. 2458. The Federal CIO
Council has it at:
http://www.cio.gov/documents/e_gov_act_2002.pdf.
You may also
want to check out: