FEDERAL
SECTOR REPORT
January 1997
(c) P2C2 Group,
Inc.
Resumes
The Human Resource
Dimension of Winning Proposals
On some
proposal review panels, some government reviewers have been known
to turn first to the project organization section to identify who has
been
proposed as the project manager or principal investigator. While this
is
not always the case and depends partly on the nature of the
requirement,
the importance of personnel is often of great importance. This is
particularly
true when:
- The principal purpose of the
project is to furnish technical personnel
to support a program or office
- A study, research, or evaluation
project needs the credibility of a
known expert as principal investigator
- A Research & Development
project is a high-risk venture that requires
experienced leadership and management to avoid the risk of technical
pitfalls,
scheduling problems, and cost overruns
- A systems integration project needs
a heavy-duty manager who has steered
similarly large and complex projects to completion
- A project will have high visibility
in the Congress, the White House,
or industry.
Even
when heavy weighting is not placed on key personnel, many Requests for
Proposals specify years and types of experience required for certain
positions and/or labor categories. Responding effectively to these
personnel requirements can make the difference between winning and
losing.
Our discussion of
resumes will address: (1) the art of resumes, (2) resume styles, (3)
solutions to problems, and (4) corporate information systems.
1.
The
Art of Resumes
As everyone who has
ever searched for a job knows, writing a resume is a unique art form.
Many of the books written for job seekers will provide good ideas for
proposal managers and resume editors. Some of the general themes are:
keep it focused on the specific position sought, emphasize
accomplishments, use a business-like style and avoid hype, keep it
well-organized and easy to read, use a format that conveys quality and
discipline, and make certain that it is well-edited and carefully
prepared.
Like
an
individual resume for job seekers, the purpose of resumes
in a proposal is to win a job--the competitive project. Using this
analogy,
the government reviewer becomes the "employer," and the resumes must
sell
the notion that the individuals proposed were "born" for their position
on
the project. This may sound a bit extreme, but most employers
(including
government reviewers) can detect quickly a square peg being proposed
for
a round hole. Each resume must fit the proposed position.
Resumes
have
perhaps 60 seconds to convince the reader that the candidate is worth
considering. For individual job seekers, a resume that is not clearly
and instantly responsive will be relegated to the big "NO" stack of
rejects. For proposals, the government reviewers will be tempted to say
"yuck" and place a low score on the evaluation criteria for personnel.
Resumes
&
Roles
Resumes in a
proposal are even more challenging than individual resumes, however.
Each resume must fit the proposed role. To illustrate:
A project manager whose resume focuses only on technical expertise is
deficient. Experience in management, supervision, technical leadership,
customer relations, quality assurance, scheduling, budget control,
report preparation, and interpersonal communication are also important.
A project manager plays a role that usually serves as a bridge between
operational management and technical execution.
An applications programmer who is proposed as a systems programmer is
not cast in an appropriate role, unless the resume explains in detail
how the individual has gained in-depth experience with the operating
system(s) applicable to the customer's computing environment. In
addition to experience, seminars, training, and academic courses in
systems programming could also help support the role of placement as a
systems programmer.
A technical expert cast in the role of trainer is not appropriate,
unless the resume explains experience (or educational preparation) in
user support, instruction, materials development skills, oral
communication skills, and training evaluation.
The Team Concept
Unlike individual job
seekers, a proposal presents a team of personnel. It is appropriate to
explain how the team will interact to achieve a high level of quality
and reliable performance. For example, in the resume of the technical
expert (previous bulleted paragraph), it would be appropriate to
discuss how this individual has previously collaborated with an
instructional technologist to design courses, or how the technical
expert has served as co-trainer with professional trainers.
Staffing
a
project is a matter of presenting an entire team which
has a unique combination of skills, together, to achieve synergy and
produce
exceptional results. This theme should permeate the individual resumes
as
well as the proposal section on project organization and
management.
Graphics can be used
effectively to explain the team concept. Specifics depend on the RFP,
but some of the variations include:
- Task-level staff organization
charts which depict how individuals will interact to perform specific
work
- A person-hour matrix by task and
position, presenting the hours each labor category will devote to each
task or sub-task specified by the RFP
- Flow charts that explain the
interaction of the project team.
Following is an example of a table
that describes the team strategy for a Year 2000 (Y2K) Project:
Specialists by
Y2K Layer
|
Y2K
Layer
|
Clients
|
Servers/ Mainframe
|
Technical
Specialists
|
Independent Testing
|
|
Manual Procedures
& Agency Forms
|
|
|
Business Process
Re-engineering Specialist, Computer System
Analyst III
|
x
|
|
Data/Databases
|
x
|
x
|
Computer System
Analyst III, Database Programmers
|
x
|
|
Applications
Programs
|
x
|
x
|
Computer Systems
Analyst III, Database Programmers
|
x
|
|
Software
Libraries & Functions
|
|
x
|
Systems
Programmer, Database Programmer
|
x
|
|
Operating System
|
x
|
x
|
Systems Programmer
|
x
|
|
Hardware &
Firmware incl. CMOS
|
x
|
x
|
System Engineer,
PC Technician
|
x
|
|
Network &
Network Operating System
|
x
|
x
|
Network Engineer,
Systems Programmer
|
x
|
|
Intranet
|
x
|
x
|
Computer
Programmer III (Mainframe), UNIX Systems Programmer,
Computer System Analyst III
|
x
|
|
External Systems
|
|
x
|
Computer
Programmer III, Computer System Analyst III
|
x
|
Rewriting
the Resume
As we have noted,
each resume should read as if the individual had been born for the
proposed position. This usually means a highly selective approach to
including information--perhaps only 30% of an individual's total
experience will be presented in the resume for a specific proposal.
We're happy than John or Joan has broad, diverse experience, but the
proposal resume must primarily provide evidence that John or Joan can
perform, beyond a reasonable doubt, the responsibilities in the
position description for his or her role in the project.
Most
individuals
become too attached to their experience (because
it represents hard work and accomplishments important to them), and
usually
a third party needs to prepare the resumes for a proposal. A good
editor
or rewrite person can usually prepare better resumes that focus on the
proposal
requirements. However, this needs to be a savvy person who can cast
each
individual in the appropriate role and clearly
present 100% compliance with the requirements of the RFP.
Rewriting
the resume usually means that an employee's institutional resume needs
to be 8 to 10 pages in length to create an edited proposal resume of
two or three pages in length. Again, only the most relevant information
will be included in the proposal resume.
Invariably,
the
resume editor will usually need to gather additional
information from many of the proposed individuals. Each time
information
is gathered, it should be used to update the corporate resume as well
as
the proposal resume so that the information will be available for
future
projects.
The Summary
We
like
to include a summary paragraph at the beginning of a resume
which (1) explains the individual's role, (2) establishes the
experience
and skills of the individual, and (3) identifies how the individual
meets
the requirements of the RFP. This should serve as a "road map" for the
reader,
who will be able to substantiate the summary information in the body of
the
resume, which contains detailed information. An example of a summary is
as
follows:
Dr.
Barrett has nine years of experience as program manager
for major aerospace contracts with NASA and the Department of Defense,
where
he provided the leadership to prototype, test, and manufacture
high-altitude,
mission-critical communications and sensing devices which often
required
breakthroughs in miniaturization of components as well as the
minimization
of power consumption. In these positions, he was responsible for annual
budgets
of up to $20 million, head counts of up to 108 team members, and up to
20
subcontractors and major suppliers. He was responsible for the
contract's
liaison with the government's Contracting Officer's Representatives,
the
interface with agency missions and commands responsible for the
contracts,
and briefings to government leadership. Dr. Barrett received a
commendation
from the Secretary of Defense in 1988 for his contributions to
satellite-based
sensing systems. Previously, he was Associate Director of the Center
for
Digital Communications Research at UCLA. His doctorate is in electrical
engineering,
where he was also granted the master's degree in physics. Dr. Barrett's
BSEE
degree is from Purdue University.
If
the
government specifies how the resumes are to be organized
and does not sanction this type of introductory paragraph/section, then
we
place the paragraphs in the narrative of the project organization and
management.
References
Some
of
today's RFPs require the names, titles and phone numbers
of current and former supervisors of key personnel proposed (typically
for
the past 5 or 10 years). Take this requirement very seriously, and
verify
that the phone numbers are correct. If a former supervisor has "moved,"
this
should be noted and the current phone number provided.
While
it
can be time consuming, it is a good idea for your personnel
office to call references and ask for an evaluation of past
performance.
The former supervisor may refer you to the personnel office of the
former
employer, and that reference can be pursued also. Your explanation to
references
can be that the individual is being considered for a new
position--which
is true since award of the project to you would create a new position
for
the proposed individual.
A
good
corporate practice is for the personnel office to call
all references at the time of recruiting/ screening--and to maintain
detailed
records of comments by former supervisors. If done properly, this would
eliminate
the need to check references at the time of preparing a proposal. Of
course,
such information is usually subject to your organization's privacy
rules.
Hopefully
during
the initial recruiting and screening process,
your organization also verifies the accuracy of information about
educational
credentials and certifications. A serious number of job applicants,
perhaps
one in four, misrepresent their credentials, and you do not want to be
placed
in a position of proposing personnel with phony qualifications.
Bringing Resumes to Life
For
decades,
non-fiction writers have used the techniques of fiction
to bring technical information to life. Characterization can be
applied,
gently and sparingly, to resumes and narrative paragraphs about
personnel
to bring them to life. You want the reader to see the individuals as
dynamic
persons who are real assets to the project and who will be a pleasure
with
whom to work. Compare these two paragraphs:
The Olympus
Program. Mr. Arbuckle was program manager of the Olympus Program from
1991 to 1993, where he oversaw the development of a super minicomputer
system capable of long-range forecasting for weather and crops.
Supervised a technical staff of 60 and managed the acquisition/
integration of required hardware and software. Responsible for $7.5
million annual budget. Administered a major subcontracting/acquisition
initiative for the hardware and software platform. Responsible for
customer interface, project reporting, scheduling, approval of
purchases, and project completion.
The Olympus
Program. Upon becoming program manager in 1991, Mr. Arbuckle faced a
difficult choice: either embrace an unproven computer technology or
adhere to the existing program plan which included the risk cost
overruns and delayed contract deliverables. He responded by canceling
the existing subcontract for information technology hardware/software
and recompeting it. The incumbent subcontractor won the recompete by
updating its technology, offering a massively parallel computing
system, and guaranteeing a firm fixed price with an improved delivery
schedule. Mr. Arbuckle provided the leadership to reorient the project
staff of 60 to the new technology, launched a quality management
program that complies with ISO 9000, kept the project within its $7.5
million annual budget, and in 1993 completed the project three weeks
ahead of schedule. He was responsible for teamwork with the government
and within the company that was necessary to create a super
minicomputer system capable of long-range weather forecasting and the
estimating of agricultural markets on a crop-by-crop and
country-by-country basis.
If
you
were in the government, which program manager would you
prefer to have on your agency's team? The second version of the
"Olympus"
paragraph demonstrates Mr. Arbuckle's character--a take-charge style, a
willingness
to solve problems, leadership qualities, a sense of teamwork, and a
commitment
to fulfilling the requirements of the contract.
2.
Resume
Styles
The
style
of resumes vary widely and will depend on the RFP, the
government agency, and your own organization. In our newsletter on
Pre-Solicitation
Marketing (November 1996), we pointed out that you should gather
intelligence
before the RFP is issued, and one of your agendas should be to find out
the
style of resume that is customary within the agency for the type of
project
you are bidding. Following are several examples.
Functional
Resume, organized by areas of expertise with each topic
combining both experience and associated
education/training/certification.
This format places a great deal of emphasis on the functional skills
and
experience of the individual, making it easy for government reviewers
to
match RFP requirements for specific types of experience with the
resume.
To illustrate, the resume of a Statistician might include functional
topics
on survey design, sampling, multi-variate analysis, linear regression,
nonparametric
statistics, and statistical software experience. The organization of
the
overall resume might be as follows:
- Summary
- Functional
Experience & Skills
- Employment
Chronology (brief listing of employers, positions,
and dates)
- Education
- Training and
Certification
- Recognition
Program
Resume, organized by government program. This is similar to the
functional resume, but the information is organized by program. For
example, an individual might have had three different positions under
two contracts in support of one program (Aegis, cancer research, etc.).
Some individuals may be former government employees where they also
gained program experience. The program resume is particularly helpful
in organizing the experience of individuals who have played a variety
of roles in support of one or several major government programs, for an
emphasis becomes broad knowledge/understanding of the program. The
organization of the resume might be as follows:
- Summary
- Program Experience
- Employment Chronology (brief
listing of employers, positions, and dates)
- Education
- Training and Certification
- Recognition
Historical Resume,
organized by
employer (in reverse chronology). This
is the "classic resume" which many job seekers use, and its emphasis is
on
experience and responsibilities by job or employer. A typical
presentation
of the overall resume would be:
- Summary
- Education
- Employment History (full details of
position, experience, accomplishments
as well as employer, position and dates)
- Additional Qualifications (Training
and Certification)
- Recognition
Academic
Resume. The curriculum vitae
is still used in many academic and research circles. The organization
is
as follows:
- Education
- Career History
- Research Experience
- Professional Activities
(Memberships and Participation on Committees,
etc.)
- Publications (Journal Articles,
Books, Papers Delivered)
Hybrid Resume. There are
many
variations to the above resume styles. References
may be inserted either in Employment Chronology/History or as a
separate
section. In some proposals, educational credentials should be presented
first.
(3)
Solutions
to Problems
Of course, preparing resumes can be
difficult. We will address a few of
the problems encountered by proposal managers.
Weak Educational Credentials.
A
few
truly outstanding technical people
have virtually no academic credentials. They learned by doing while a
technology
was in its infancy and "grew up" with that technology. Following is one
example
of an attempt to address this type of problem:
Educational
Qualifications
Ms. Jones became
qualified to perform the duties of Webmaster through 12 years of
self-study and experience gained while administering Internet sites for
ComPlex Engineering Services and Defense Research Corporation. In 1984,
she implemented a UNIX-based e-mail server and FTP site for ComPlex,
where she administered network security, e-mail names and passwords,
and FTP files available for upload/download. Between 1986 and 1989, Ms.
Jones completed three courses in UNIX programming and attended two
ARPNet workshops. In 1991, based on the expertise she had gained, Ms.
Jones taught a course titled "Introduction to the Internet" for Defense
Research Corporation employees and subsequently wrote a user guide on
the same subject. In 1993, she became an early user of HTML code, and
she designed, implemented and administered the corporation's World Wide
Web site. Based on the quality of the site, XYZ Agency awarded a
contract for the design/development of its WWW site, and Ms. Jones has
18 months experience in serving as Webmaster for the XYZ Agency. In
1996, she received a letter of commendation from that agency for her
outstanding services. During her career, Ms. Jones has completed a
total of 32 hours of college credit courses and attended numerous
seminars and workshops on the Internet and WWW.
Of
course, not every resume has the potential of Ms. Jones. Which brings
up another point: If a resume is too difficult to overhaul, you are
probably proposing the wrong person for the job!
Insufficient Program Experience.
In some cases, your senior personnel may be great people but lack
significant experience with the agency or program for which the
proposal is being written. Several work-arounds are:
- Identify a subcontractor who can
supply the necessary experience
- Establish a panel of distinguished
advisors (consultants) who assist the project director or program
manager with strategic planning and reviews
- Explain specifically how past
experience is relevant to the program/RFP (and possibly that this
experience will bring new perspectives and innovations to the customer
agency)
- Consider a technical approach which
applies participatory process consulting which involves stakeholders
(usually client personnel) in shaping the project's deliverables.
For
the first two tactics, you will insert resumes from the subcontractor
or consultants to bolster the required experience. For relating past
experience to the agency's requirements, the resumes will need to
explain the relevance of the personnel--perhaps supported in the
technical proposal by an abbreviated compliance matrix for personnel
and a rationale for why the backgrounds of personnel will lead to the
best solution.
Contingent Hires. One of
the more awkward situations in many proposals is a heavy reliance on
contingent hires--personnel who are not yet employees of your
organization but who will work for the project if you win the award.
While this sometimes is the only practical solution for certain
proposals, it requires special attention when preparing resumes.
At
minimum,
the resumes of contingent hires should be as robust
as those of in-house personnel, and the format should be exactly the
same.
In the proposal or even the resume, it may also be appropriate to state
why
and how each individual was selected for the
contingent
position. Such explanations should demonstrate that you have been
diligent
is searching for the best and most appropriate individuals for each
position.
For
one
or two of the most important key personnel in the proposal,
you may want to consider hiring them as part-time employees (if this
would
not be a conflict of interest with their current employer). Even hiring
them
for two days a month until contract award means that you can honestly
list
them as employees. Titles like Senior Technical Advisor, Science
Officer,
Research Scientist, and Strategic Planning Advisor come to mind for
these
positions. Of course, you would use at least some of this time for
input
into the proposal and/or service on the read team and (hopefully) oral
presentations
to the agency.
In
situations
where the resumes of several dozen contingent hires
will be in the proposal, you may also want to consider additional
initiatives.
For example, you may want to conduct a Saturday workshop for all
contingent
hires, where you share the Statement of Work of the RFP, and a group
dynamics
specialist (trainer or participatory process consultant) conducts a
strategy
session for technical approach and technical problem solving. Several
members
of the proposal development team should be present to take notes and
develop
useful ideas/information for the proposal. The agenda for a one-day
workshop
might look like:
- Registration &
Continental Breakfast
- Welcome --
Introductory Remarks by Senior Official
- Goals and Procedures
for Workshop - by Group Dynamics Specialist
- Problem & Issues
Exercise: Review RFP and Identify Key Technical/Operational
Issues
- Brainstorming
Session
- Lunch
- Breakout Session --
in Functional Groups
- Breakout Report to
Full Workshop
- Discussion: What Are
the Best Practices that We Should Consider?
- Improve Your Resume,
Based on an Expanded Understanding of the
RFP
- Closing Remarks
Note
that
the conclusion of the workshop is an excellent time
to gain input for a revised resume, since the participants will now
have
a much better understanding of the requirements of the RFP. This is
such
a useful approach to obtaining quality input for resumes (and the
technical
proposal) that you may want to replicate the workshop for in-house
personnel
as well.
For
contingent
hires, the agenda is all "input." You won't be
revealing your internal strategy for the proposal, since this is hardly
a
secure group. However, the workshop can be an asset. Not only will you
have
an opportunity to gain good ideas from prospective project personnel,
but
you will also be able to state in resumes and the proposal that
contingent
hires participated in a broad review of the requirements of the RFP and
contributed
suggestions to the technical solution. Voila, contingent hires have now
become
a real part of the project team--and proposal team.
If
you
do a first-class job of the above workshop, you will give
the participants a very rewarding day for their efforts, and they as
well
as you will learn/benefit from it. It is also a good way of
communicating
your commitment to quality and demonstrating that your organization
pays
more than lip service to "empowering employees."
Of
course,
certain contingent hires may not be willing to attend
a public workshop, especially individuals who are now working for
competitors
or the incumbent contractor. Key personnel for the proposal who are
skittish
about public identification may be excused from the workshop if
necessary,
and they can provide their suggestions privately.
There
are
many variations to the above workshop. One of the more
recent innovations is real-time Internet conferencing, whereby
participants
(after downloading the RFP from the government site or your own FTP
server)
can engage in brainstorming and technical solutions under the guidance
of
your carefully-selected moderator. Password protection for signing onto
the
discussion is a good idea, but you should allow participants to use
their
aliases (which they should identify to you privately in advance).
Again,
this is an input session where you will not reveal your internal market
intelligence
or proposal strategy.
(4)
Corporate
Information Systems
Resume
development
and management should be a corporate-level
priority. Certainly resume accuracy and thoroughness are an important
organizational
asset in terms of winning contracts and identifying personnel with
needed
skills or experience. Organizations have taken various approaches to
resume
development and management including:
- Using proprietary
proposal management software that includes
resume maintenance functions
- Relying on advanced
word processing functions such as macros
and paragraph assembly functions
- Maintaining resume
information in database fields
- Decentralizing
resume management with each operating unit maintaining
resumes however it thinks best.
Selecting Resume Management Systems
The
choice
depends on the personnel available to maintain the
resume system, the corporate culture, and the organizational approach
to
managing proposals. In general, we believe that it is a good idea to
maintain
an organization-wide standard, even if maintenance is delegated.
Each
approach
has its trade-offs. RFPs sometimes specify unusual
formats and organization for resumes, and there is probably no solution
that
is sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of all government
competitions,
meaning that non-automated resume assembly may occasionally be
required.
The
advantage
of a structured database is that it can be searched
and sorted quickly. Moreover, functional experience, skills, and
program
experience can become neat, searchable fields. Some permit extensive
formatting
so that fonts and special typography can be embedded in the fields.
Another
option
is to use a database in conjunction with database
publishing software, such as that available under the Ventura label.
Which
solution
is "best" tends to degenerate into arguments similar
to the Presidential Debates, and many of the decisions are highly
subjective.
Some of the decisions will probably be based on your organization's
world
view of database languages, word processing, and publishing software.
It
is
usually advisable to consider the cost effectiveness and
usability of alternatives. How much time and effort does the solution
require
to maintain? Can your average clerical worker and marketing assistant
use
it? Is it reliable when you are facing wild proposal deadlines?
Keeping Resumes Up-to-Date
Regardless
of
the technology applied to resume systems, the truly
difficult task is keeping resumes up to date. Our fearless estimate is
that
at least 50% of the resumes in your average organization are out of
date
at any given time. Personnel should update their resume every time they
undergo
a performance review, a promotion, and reassignment to a new project.
Little
considerations like withholding raises until paperwork (including
resume)
is complete may do the trick.
Talent Bank of Job Seekers
Many
organizations
maintain on-line resumes of job applicants,
especially for individuals with frequently-needed skills/experience.
OCR
scanning can make them accessible through key word text searches, and
some
of the powerful Internet search engines are now available for
installation
on corporate networks and intranets.
Scanning
the
resumes of the most promising job candidates has
a double benefit: Not only can the resumes be searchable on-line, but
they
can be transformed into proposal resumes without total rekeying.
Collecting Data about Personnel
References
As
we
have already noted, the best time to collect detailed information
from former supervisors is at the time an individual is a job
candidate.
Especially for key personnel, the name, title and telephone number of
the
former supervisors will be needed for proposal resumes. Additionally,
it
is critical to know what these folks are going to say, and this
information
should be documented when a candidate is processed for hiring.
Reference
information
is highly sensitive, and your organization
will need to establish and honor policies which protects the privacy of
employees.
Moreover, there is always the possibility that a supervisor can be
unfair
or dishonest, with the documented remarks being a form of slander.
So
the
information about personnel references should probably
remain in your personnel office. However, based on policies approved by
your
officers and attorneys, the personnel office might review the names of
individuals
whose references will appear in proposals. They need to be able to
indicate
whether there are any red flags and, using approved corporate
procedures
for such information, discretely inform the proposal manager.