|
STRONG PROJECT
MANAGERS CAN
ACE THE EXHIBIT 300
PROCESS
The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has good news for experienced project managers.
They can succeed in OMB budget reviews by doing what they do best:
getting project results.
OMB is making it clear that
the focus of agency spending for information technology (IT) should be
on results that are achieved through good project management. The new
Exhibit 300 defined by OMB Circular A-11, Part 7, is
primarily a scorecard for project management and performance results.
The Fiscal Year 2008
Exhibit 300 provides a baseline against which OMB budget examiners can
review your progress-annually and even quarterly-regarding:
-
Budget, schedule, and EVMS
results
-
Metrics for mission and
program performance
-
Acquisition management
-
Security and risk management
-
Performance of Steady State
investments
-
Alignment of Enterprise
Architecture
-
Compliance with various
requirements such as privacy and records management
In years past, pages and
pages of complex text were required. Agencies experienced limited
accountability for the promises and data presented in the Exhibit 300s.
Projects with runaway budgets or failed systems drew attention, but
merely weak projects muddled along, although sometimes residing in the
purgatory of OMB's Watch List. However, as Bob Dylan once sang, "The
times they are a-changin."
Be Prepared
Today and in the years
ahead, acceptable IT performance requires year-round project
management, and it is no longer possible to ace your agency's IT budget
by cramming on Exhibit 300s for a month or two. Next year, you must
show a year's worth of progress and results.
All of this sounds like a
great opportunity for project managers who are go-getters. Achieving a
year (or multiple years) of results requires preparation and execution:
Baseline and
Monitor. Define your performance measures
carefully -- and make sure you have all of the baseline data against
which to track results. Determine how you will
monitor and manage performance to achieve measurable improvements. Keep
records, and document your successes.
Plan and
Manage. Have a plan that spreads the work
realistically throughout the year. In addition to project execution, it
is crucial to provide ongoing support for compliance issues such as
security, privacy, records management, acquisition planning, and
Enterprise Architecture (EA) management. The Project Management Book of
Knowledge (PMBOK®) provides concise guidance,
particularly when used within the context of your agency's strategic
plans and annual performance goals.
Manage EVMS
for Success. Favorable EVMS Performance (+/- 10%) requires
very sound project planning as reflected in your scope, Work Breakdown
Structure, schedule, and accuracy of your cost estimates. Every month
-- or more often -- monitor deviations and take immediate, aggressive
corrective action. Project budgets and schedules get out of control
quickly, and you must be an activist manager to achieve your EVMS
numbers.
Acquisitions.
Get smart with your acquisitions.
Project scopes and functional performance objectives have to be crystal
clear so that a capable contractor can achieve milestones within
schedule and costs. Take corrective action immediately if cost or
schedule variance is unacceptable.
Knowledge
Management. Project records and
documentation are increasingly important. Professional
project management is in, and "seat of the pants" managers will be out.
Structured information enables intelligent management, reduces risk,
enables project continuity, and provides the framework for continuous
review and improvement.
Integrated
Project Reviews. At minimum there should
be quarterly reviews to assess the overall health of the project. This
should encompass the works: mission-related
performance, EVMS results, risks, security, compliance issues,
technical performance, innovation, and quality. It should also include
an assessment of whether the project is on track to fare well in next
year's Exhibit 300. Since the world is seldom utopian, reviews will
usually identify the need for corrective actions, which of course are
useless except when acted upon.
Operational
Analysis Reviews. Operational Analysis has traditionally been
the boring country cousin of the investment management process,
relegated to a role in Steady State projects. But take a fresh look:
These reviews get at the quality and mission performance issues that
are not even addressed by Earned Value Data, and the long-term value of
IT of operational systems rides heavily on the back of operational
analysis. What's more, a large share of Federal IT spending is for
Steady State investments, and you can't get control of overall costs
until you get a handle on your in-place operational systems. (According
to March 2005 data from OMB, the President's proposed budget for
Fiscal Year 2006 included $42.4 billion for Steady State spending out
of a total of $63.5 billion for IT.)
|
HOW
DO YOUR PROJECTS RATE?
Give
yourself 4 points for each item where you can answer yes
for the project. A perfect score will be 100.
-
Commitment
and support from senior management
-
A written
project charter
-
A
qualified project manager
-
An active
Integrated Project Team
-
Alignment
with the Enterprise Architecture and, when needed, an EA transition
plan
-
A clearly
defined scope
-
Verifiable contributions
to the agency mission and IT strategic plan
-
A Work
Breakdown Structure that maps to mission-critical outputs
-
A project
plan with executable components, milestones, and resources
-
A risk
management plan reviewed and updated monthly
-
Lifecycle
budget with management reserve for risk-adjusted costs
-
A written
Acquisition Plan that is actually used and useful
-
High
consistency between the Acquisition Plan, Lifecycle Budget, and
contractor costs
-
EVMS
implemented for major acquisitions with detailed monthly reviews
-
Corrective
action plans for deviaitons from EVMS baseline
-
Up-to-date
operational analysis reviews for Steady State investments
-
Independent
Baseline Review at least annually
-
Compliance
with information security requirements or a Plan of Action &
Milestones that is on track
-
Performance
measures including baseline and current validated data
-
Quality and
customer satisfaction measures in addition to EVMS efficiency
measures
-
Tracking of
planned and actual benefits
-
Tracking of
planned and actual costs including Return on Investment
-
Updated
Alternatives Analyses including for modernization.
-
Flat or declining system
lifecycle costs
-
Improved service to
customers
Show Stoppers:
Any of the following issues
can derail your project, regardless of your project score:
Project has not made
significant progress in resolving FISMA security requirements.
Project is seriously over
budget.
Project is seriously behind
schedule.
The project fails to provide basic
functionality identified in the requirements analysis.
A
qualified and experienced project manager is not in charge of the
investment.
The
project is no longer a priority for the agency mission and budget.
|
|
SERVICES
The P2C2 Group helps
agencies transform IT compliance activities into results that leverage
mission and programs in measurable ways. This includes IT strategic
planning, CPIC, EVMS, FISMA, the FEA, and analyzing performance. Our
firm specializes in capital programming, which integrates the planning,
acquisition, project management, and operational control of
capital assets. Our consulting services assist agencies in improving
asset management, mission results, and compliance with regulatory
requirements.
Professionals in the P2C2
Group's consulting practice are highly experienced, have proven
performance records in multiple agencies of the United States
government, and are dedicated to implementing best practices.
|
|