BETTER PROJECTS & PROGRAMS


November 2007

Financial Management as the Springboard for Enterprise IT Management

The P2C2 Group

Home Page


© 2007 P2C2 Group, Inc.

 


Financial Management:  Springboard for Enterprise IT

 

Federal financial management systems, including the Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB), provide a golden opportunity to launch a long-term approach to enterprise management of information technology. This is particularly true if you consider both the core financial system and “feeder systems.”

 

Improving Federal financial management has been a longstanding focus within government. Key legislative underpinnings include the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990, as well as the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act (FFMIA) of 1996.

 

Perhaps less apparent, financial management systems provide a common leverage point for defining and building an enterprise-level methodology for IT management. This is a focus where it seems plausible to sustain bi-partisan support in future years.

 

Why Financial Systems

 

What makes this opportunity for transforming IT management so significant is that financial management requirements cut across all Federal agencies and programs. No responsible government exec can say, “this doesn’t involve me, and it’s not my problem.”

 

The scope of this article is on financial management systems as a leverage point for building a comprehensive enterprise-level discipline for IT management that ultimately extends to all agency missions and lines of business. It can serve as the blueprint for a higher level of IT performance and accountability.

 

The potential payoff for the enterprise is huge: achieving strong financial management and an enterprise-wide approach to IT management is a dual victory for agencies, personnel, and taxpayers.

 

Benefits of Enterprise IT Management

 

Federal IT management frequently suffers from its own stovepipe operations, largely because of divergent regulatory requirements. At the departmental/agency level, there tends to be separate processes for IT strategic planning, architecture, capital planning and investment control, acquisition, operations, and security. Theoretically, all of these functions should be rolled up at the enterprise level into a unified management discipline, and they should be integrated strategically with other corporate investment portfolios, such as human capital, facilities, and overall asset management.

 

An enterprise approach to IT management has been further constrained by budget accountability on the basis of Exhibit 300s rather than the agency portfolio as a whole. Departments must justify their major IT investments to OMB on a piecemeal basis, with as many as a hundred Exhibit 300s within one civilian agency.

 

In our September 2007 article, we also pointed out that between 70 – 80 percent of the Federal IT budget is in steady state “Operations & Maintenance.” This is a huge resource commitment that must be addressed when considering how to implement an enterprise approach to IT portfolio management.

 

Notwithstanding these constraints, agencies are moving toward portfolio management and other approaches that better integrate the various disciplines and processes involved in IT management at the enterprise level. However, the complexity is daunting. Moreover, integration into a comprehensive plan for business transformation, involving all resources, is an even greater challenge because of the magnitude of overall agency outlays: $577.1 billion (Defense) to $7.8 billion (EPA). (IT budget request from OMB, May 2007, summary spreadsheet. Estimate of outlays from Mid-Session Review, July 2007, page 34).

 

The best way to address the challenges of our Federal IT elephant may be one leg at a time. Federal financial systems provide the leg up, and it is an excellent way to pursue implementation of Information Technology Investment Management (ITIM).

 

Opportunities for CIOs

 

Neither the CIO nor any other agency executive can single-handedly achieve all of the intended benefits and Return on Investment (ROI) for IT investments. After all, IT is one of many ingredients that must be combined strategically into a long-term recipe for business transformation.

 

The big payoff for IT investments—in terms of both ROI and mission results for the agency—is business transformation, where IT improvements are implemented strategically in concert with many other management actions. However, this requires sustained collaboration over the long term by the entire agency executive team.

 

Federal financial systems give the entire executive team (ET) to push the enterprise toward constructive transformation that yields maximum benefits and ROI. Broad involvement is crucial because upgrading or replacing systems will not alone result in first class financial management in the executive branch. Transformation involves strategy, architectural alignment, business processes and workflow, human capital, enterprise architecture, and security.

 

Modernization of Federal financial systems can give the CIO an opportunity to engage the entire enterprise and solve the persistent challenge of using IT to best advantage—by embedding technology investments into broader, enterprise-class initiatives.

 

The Payoff for Federal Financial Management

 

When combined with a strategic transformation process, IT-enabled improvements to financial systems can yield first class financial management throughout the executive branch. This will help resolve current weaknesses which were noted in testimony by the General Accountability Office in March 2007:

 

  • Financial management systems must be modernized to provide the complete range of information needed for accountability, performance reporting, and decision making.
  • Full adoption of … best practices is equally important as OMB moves forward on its initiative to migrate agencies to shared service providers.
  • The federal government continues to face a myriad of material weaknesses and reportable conditions in internal control related to property, plant, and equipment; inventories and related property; liabilities and commitments and contingencies; and disbursement activities, just to mention a few of the problem areas.
  • The federal financial workforce … is not well positioned to support the needs of tomorrow. The lack of a sufficient number of staff with the requisite knowledge, skills, and experience has hampered financial management operations at key agencies

Payoff for IT Professionals

 

If we in IT management can make financial management systems work well across the executive branch, we will strengthen our case that IT should be a core player for 21st century business transformation in many other venues—including those that are unique to a particular agency.

 

The “bang for the buck” can only be achieved by using IT as one of the enablers of enterprise-level business transformation. To make good on the value of IT budgets, we must take IT management and portfolio management to the next level.

 

Federal financial systems offer IT professionals a means for realizing the value and promise of IT, when implemented at the enterprise level in concert with overall transformation. In addition, first-class financial systems will define best practices that can be applied to most of the other agency lines of business through:

 

  • Ongoing partnerships among executives and sub-organizations within the enterprise
  • Data standardization and information architecture
  • Intragovernmental operability
  • Standardized applications and a reduction in the cost of customization and maintenance of systems
  • Integration of IT with corporate portfolio management
  • IT as an embedded asset in broad business transformation
  • Enterprise-driven strategic IT decisions
  • A better and broader understanding of how IT serves the enterprise.
Build ITIM capabilities gradually beginning with financial systems 

Spiral Development Process for Using Financial Systems to Evolve Enterprise-Level IT Management

Start with Financial Systems, Build ITIM Capabilities Gradually for Entire Portfolio

Evolving Enterprise-Level Management

 

There are no cookbook formulas for using financial management systems as a lever for evolving 21st century IT enterprise management methodology. However, the Information Technology Investment Management (ITIM) model provides a workable framework that can readily be applied to both improved financial management systems and enterprise IT management.

 

Our previous article has discussed ITIM, including variations on the basic approach described by the General Accountability Office in its publication GAO-04-394G. Basically, GAO’s maturity model addresses the need for developing a complete investment portfolio, improving the management process, and leveraging IT for strategic outcomes.

 

Key Websites

 

Office of Federal Financial Management. Created within OMB by the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990. Responsible for implementing the financial management improvement priorities of the President, establishing government-wide financial management policies of executive agencies, and carrying out the financial management functions of the CFO Act.

 

Financial Systems Integration Office (FSIO). The Financial Systems Integration Office (FSIO) within the General Services Administration, was formerly known as the Joint Financial Management Improvement Program (JFMIP) staff office. FSIO is responsible for (1) core financial systems requirements development, testing and product certification, (2) supporting the Federal financial community on priority projects, and (3) conducting outreach through an annual financial management conference and other related activities.

 

Chief Financial Officers Council. The CFOs and Deputy CFOs of the largest federal agencies and senior officials of OMB and Treasury - work collaboratively to improve financial management

 

Chief Information Officers Council. Authorized by the E-Government Act of 2002 and previously by Executive Order. The CIO Council serves as the principal interagency forum for improving practices in the design, modernization, use, sharing, and performance of Federal Government agency information resources.

 

General Accountability Office. An arm of Congress, the GAO publishes numerous reports about financial management and information systems.

 

Financial Management Service. The bureau within the Treasury Department responsible for central payment services to federal agencies, to operate the federal government's collections and deposit systems, to provide governmentwide accounting and reporting services, and to manage the collection of delinquent debt owed to the government.

 

Information

 

Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB). This is a Presidential Initiative managed by General Services Administration that seeks to leverage common standards and provide shared solutions. It will reduce the duplication of efforts since each agency will not need to “reinvent the wheel” by building and maintaining its own customized financial systems.

 

Federal Financial Systems Branch. This branch of the OMB Office of Federal Financial Management is responsible for ensuring that the government-wide Federal financial management systems architecture is producing the information needed to support first class financial management.

 

Core Financial System Requirements Exposure Draft (FFMSR).  This document specifies the mandatory functional and technical requirements that agency financial management systems must meet in order to be considered compliant with Federal standards as mandated by the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act (FFMIA). Check for updates; the exposure draft is dated February 2005.

 

Federal Enterprise Architecture. The FEA is intended to be entirely business driven and maps to critical areas for strong financial management: budget allocation, budget/performance integration, e-government, and cross-agency collaboration.

 

  • Business Reference Model: Financial Management. This segment of the BRM includes reporting and information, accounting, payments, collections and receivables, budget and finance, asset and liability management. It does not include important interrelated resource systems such as human resources (e.g., compensation and benefits management).

Additional Exposure Drafts:

 

FMLoB Migration Planning Guidance (Version 1), published by the GSA Financial Systems Integration Office. The primary purpose of the guidance is to help agencies prepare for, and manage, a migration of their financial management system operations to a shared services environment under the Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB) initiative. The Guidance is written from the standpoint of providing tools and guidance to agency executives, including Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), Chief Information Officers (CIOs), and Chief Acquisition Officers (CAOs) and their management teams.

 

Summary of Qualified Software Based on Full Core and P224 Incremental Tests. This is FSIO’s list of core financial software tested and qualified.

 

Financial Management Systems, Additional Efforts Needed to Address Key Causes of Modernization Failures. This GAO report identifies a number of issues that could impact initiatives to modernize financial systems. One of the key issues is change management.

 

GAO Financial Audit Manual, Exposure Draft (2 volumes). See especially sections on IT system controls. General Accountability Office, October 2007.

 

Laws and Regulations.  This web page is the Office of Federal Financial Management’s summary of key legislation and OMB circulars applicable to Federal financial management.

 

Books: Enterprise IT Management

 

From Business Strategy to IT Action. Robert J. Benson, Tom Bugnitz, and Bill Walton. Wiley, 2004.

 

Building Enterprise Information Architecture: Reengineering Information Systems. Melissa Cook. Hewlett Packard Professional Books; Prentice Hall, 1996.

 

The Standard for Portfolio Management. Project Management Institute, 2006.

 

Optimizing Corporate Portfolio Management: Aligning Investment Proposals with Organizational Strategy. Anand Sanwal and Gary Crittenden. Wiley, 2007.

 

The Information Paradox: Realizing the Business Benefits of Information Technology. John Thorp and DMR’s Center for Strategic Leadership. McGraw Hill, 1998.

 

Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Peter Weill and David Robertson. Harvard Business School Press, 2006.

 

IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Performance. Peter Weill and Jeanne Ross. Harvard Business School Press, 2004.

Flow for Using Financial Systems as Springboard for Enterprise Portfolio Management 

e-ITIM

 

Flow for Using Financial Systems as Springboard for Enterprise ITIM

P2C2 GROUP

The P2C2 Group helps agencies and prime contractors leverage IT to achieve business results. Our services include planning, investment management, documentation, and analysis. Key strengths include conceptualizing, developing, synthesizing, writing, crunching numbers, analyzing, supporting new initiatives, and assisting with change.

 

It’s always nice to hear from readers, clients and potential clients, and friends. Drop me an e-mail sometime. Together we can make a difference for government and the public.

HOME PAGE 

 

Elena and I did go to the GIT Rockin’ event in Falls Church (October 18), and it was a blast. One group had a vocalist who made me feel like I was in a Chicago blues club. But overall, my vote went to the NASA band.

 

There has been a lot of action on the home front. My son John just moved to Boston to work for Northwest Airlines. My daughter Leslie just graduated from a technical college. My grandkid Kyla is about to turn one year old … and keep my daughter Carrie on the run.

 

I’ve been promising Bill Andre that I would mention his new website; so here it is: ProposalCafe.com is a portal for people who develop commercial, government, and grant proposals. Please take a look and let Bill know what you think.

 

Best regards,

Jim Kendrick, PMP, CMC
Certified Management Consultant
P2C2 Group, Inc.
4101 Denfeld Avenue
Kensington, MD 20895
301-942-7985

NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE

The P2C2 Group, Inc.
4101 Denfeld Avenue | Kensington, MD 20895
Point of Contact: Jim Kendrick, President
e-mail: kendrick@p2c2group.com
phone: 301-942-7985 | fax: 301-942-7986